Explanations of comparative facts
نویسندگان
چکیده
A comparative fact can be presented in two ways. ‘Among white evangelical Christians, Obama had 40% fewer votes than McCain.’ or ‘Among white evangelical Christians, McCain had 40% more votes than Obama.’ Focusing on why Obama had fewer votes than McCain may result in a different explanation from focusing on why McCain had more votes than Obama, although it is the same fact. Thus what determines whether we focus in our explanation on Obama or McCain? In two studies, we show that people generally focused more on the first part of the comparative fact. However, when the comparative fact is presented in a negative frame (‘less ... than’) there was a shift in focus from the first to the second part of the fact. For neutral items this moderating effect did not occur. The Principle of Lexical Marking (Clark, 1969) and Loss Aversion (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) are discussed as possible accounts for this shift in focus.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Unification in Explanations of Facts
In the literature on scientific explanation, there is a classical distinction between explanations of facts and explanations of laws. This paper is about explanations of facts. Our aim is to analyse the role of unification in explanations of this kind. We discuss five positions with respect to this role, argue for two of them and refute the three others.
متن کاملFacts, interpretations, and explanations: a review of Evelyn Fox Keller's Making sense of life.
The job of a researcher is to explain the phenomenon that he or she is seeking to understand. To do this requires the accumulation of facts. These facts are then interpreted to arrive at explanations. However, individual researchers often interpret facts in different ways and arrive at disparate explanations. In her book, Making Sense of Life, Evelyn Fox Keller (2002) outlines various approache...
متن کاملروششناسی ابن عربی در فهم و بیان آرا
Despite the grandeur of Ibn ‘Arabi’s personality, a few researches have been done about his methodology. This makes such research important and necessary. So the article has targeted discussing the subject in the realm of methodology of understanding the facts and methodology of expressing ideas, and the first, by referring to the most important texts and works of Ibn ‘Ar...
متن کاملAre causal facts really explanatorily emergent? Ladyman and Ross on higher-level causal facts and renormalization group explanation
In their Every Thing Must Go, Ladyman and Ross defend a novel version of NeoRussellian metaphysics of causation, which falls into three claims: (1) there are no fundamental physical causal facts (orthodox Russellian claim), (2) there are higher-level causal facts of the special sciences, and (3) higher-level causal facts are explanatorily emergent. While accepting claims (1) and (2), I attack c...
متن کاملWhat Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?
Certain scientific explanations of physical facts have recently been characterized as distinctively mathematical–that is, as mathematical in a different way from ordinary explanations that employ mathematics. This article identifies what it is that makes some scientific explanations distinctively mathematical and how such explanations work. These explanations are non-causal, but this does not m...
متن کامل